Quebec has twice had a referendum on whether to split from Canada.
The proposal was to have a primarily French Canada and a primarily English Canada. Some regions – First Nations, for example – would decide which to join.
There are pros and cons to a separate French Canada.
There are pros and cons to dividing the USA, as well. It wouldn’t be easy, but WHAT IF you suddenly had a Red USA and a Blue USA. The other coloured States would have a referendum as to which they want to join.
Texans might vote to form a 3rd nation.
At any time, a State might vote to move from Blue to Red, or Red to Blue.
Personally, I feel it is an insanely stupid idea where almost everyone would be worse off in a very few years.
You’d think the USA would do something about this. :-(
His University of Saskatchewan Kinesiology Colleagues celebrate Professor Russell’s retirement.
He is Professor Emeritus. That means his messy office remains. Keith will be lurking the halls many years into the future. :-)
Here’s the present I intended to get him.
It’s the thought that counts. :-)
I’ve got a love / hate relationship.
Many of the best and brightest I know are from the States. The best Gymnastics club. The best Gymnastics equipment company.
Apple and Google are from the USA.
Americans are the most innovative.
But my best guess is that the USA will go down the crapper fast, rather than have a graceful decline as did Great Britain.
There’s a fair bit of truth in this graphic.
The U.S. government gridlock looks to be continuing for at least the next 6 years.
Republicans are not going to change fast enough to make major improvement.
The Democrats seem to want to copy Republican policy, for the most part. There’s been no serious attempt to improve anything under Obama, aside from a very slight fix of Health Care.
The biggest split is on Obamacare.
They are not all that far apart on Immigration and Education.
Nate Silver – Like Bush, Many Republicans Are Moderate on Immigration
… have wealth equal to that of half the population: report
Just how rich are they? According to a new report by Oxfam, their total fortunes are equal to as much as half of that of the world’s population.
The report, which analyzes a number of studies to highlight the world’s growing economic inequality, was intended as a precursor to the World Economic Forum, which begins in Switzerland this week.
… the wealth of the richest keeps growing, while the bottom 90 per cent (i.e. most of the rest of us) keeps shrinking. …
Globe and Mail
NOT an efficient use available cash.
Most of those 85 don’t deserve to be more than piddly millionaires.
Our system is not working.
Here’s the original report that came up with that stat — Oxfam – Working for the Few – Political capture and economic inequality
This kind of headline is bad news for the Tea Party crowd. It’s damage control time for the extreme right wing. Drudge linked to a conservative site claiming the actual statistic is that the 85 richest people own about 0.7% of the world’s wealth.
I trust Oxfam.