leaving a COMMENT on a blog post

One of the biggest frustrations with blogs is leaving a COMMENT, … then wondering if anyone replied back to you.

That frustration is over.

You can now “subscribe” to any comment you leave on this blog. If I slap you with a cutting rebuke, you will get the smack down by email.

notify-email.jpg

Actually, bloggers greatly appreciate feedback, positive or negative.

And leaving a comment tells search engines like Google that the post was worthy of your attention, positive or negative.

Note that we do not use a CAPTCHA on our commenting system. No need. This blog is 100% protected by amazing anti-spam service called Akismet.

If you want to test it, leave a COMMENT below.

what the heck is “Twitter”?

I learned from the feet of the Master (Leo LaPorte) that a Twitter is HOT.

But what is Twitter?

Twitter, in a nutshell, is mobile social software that lets you broadcast and receive short messages with your social network. … mostly made up of mundane messages in answer to the question, “what are you doing?”

A never-ending steam of presence messages prompts you to update …

Ross Mayfield

You’re thinking, “what’s the point?”

… others are asking: what’s the point? Those people just don’t get it. Clearly, Twitter is an amazing new way to blog about your cat.

cathistory.PNG

mashable

Hotmail vs Gmail vs Yahoo Mail

As a travellin’ man, I need web-based email. Of the big 3, my service HOTMAIL is still ranked third.

mailmail.pngI really should switch to Gmail or Yahoo.

The three applications, along with AOL mail, make up the vast majority of the 500 million or so webmail users around the world (see chart included in this post).

Most of these users are still using the old, tedious, Ajax-free Yahoo Mail and Hotmail user interfaces, requiring page refreshes for every click.

The new applications, along with Gmail, offer a much richer experience, much like Outlook or Mac mail. When these webmail clients are performing well, their speed and ease of use is easily as good as a desktop client.

Overall we prefer Gmail over all other webmail applications because performance (speed) is consistently fast, and emails can be tagged making search much more effective. They also offer more storage and other features, and it’s free.

However, Yahoo and Live Hotmail offer more mainstream Outlook-like user interfaces (although Live Hotmail does not allow you to access other email accounts from their application), whereas Gmail takes some time to get used to. If you are looking for speed and tagging is important, Gmail is for you. If you are looking for the closest thing to Outlook online, go with Yahoo Mail.

A Comparison of Live Hotmail, Gmail and Yahoo Mail

I am now on Facebook

I was not much impressed with MySpace.

I have done nothing with it since I joined May 2006.

But Facebook seems to be a quantum leap superior site for social networking.

Security is good. And Facebook is the number one site for hosting photos with 2.3 million pics uploaded daily. (I will keep mine on Flickr, for now.)

I already have 6 “friends”.

my profile – free registration required

Facebook-Rick.jpg

more information on Facebook – Wikipedia

Google will rule

Bill is a poobah at computer services, University of Saskatchewan. Google approached him with some very enticing proposals. They offered to host the University email, for example. Bill feels Google plans to take over the Universe.

He’s not the only one.

And Google can do it.

Google controls more network fiber than any other organization. This is not to say that Google OWNS all that fiber, just that they control it through agreements with network operators. …

It is becoming very obvious what will happen over the next two to three years. More and more of us will be downloading movies and television shows over the net and with that our usage patterns will change.

Instead of using 1-3 gigabytes per month, as most broadband Internet users have in recent years, we’ll go to 1-3 gigabytes per DAY — a 30X increase that will place a huge backbone burden on ISPs. Those ISPs will be faced with the option of increasing their backbone connections by 30X, which would kill all profits, OR they could accept a peering arrangement with the local Google data center.

Seeing Google as their only alternative to bankruptcy, the ISPs will all sign on, and in doing so will transfer most of their subscriber value to Google, which will act as a huge proxy server for the Internet. We won’t know if we’re accessing the Internet or Google and for all practical purposes it won’t matter. Google will become our phone company, our cable company, our stereo system and our digital video recorder.

Soon we won’t be able to live without Google, which will have marginalized the ISPs and assumed most of the market capitalization of all the service providers it has undermined — about $1 trillion in all — which places today’s $500 Google share price about eight times too low.

It’s a grand plan, but can Google pull it off?

Yes they can.

I, Cringely . The Pulpit . When Being a Verb is Not Enough | PBS

Thanks Warrren.

what does Google pay bloggers?

Not enough.

Unfortunately Google has very little competition from Yahoo, Microsoft … or anyone else.

guy_thumb_4.jpg

An interesting tidbit from Guy Kawasaki’s wrap-up of his first full year blogging. … Note that his blog has been consistently between the 35th and 45th most popular in the world, according to Technorati. Here are some of his stats:

* 2,436,117 page views for an average of approximately 6,200/day. 21,000 people receive RSS feeds via Feedburner and 1,457 receive emails via FeedBlitz.

So just to review, that’s:

A best-selling author and genuine tech celebrity writing a thoughtful essay nearly every workday on a top-50 blog for an audience of around 30,000 people/day.

And the pay for that is about $280 a month. If Guy can get Google to write a check at all.

The Long Tail: Don’t quit your day job

want to get even with a “bad” professor?

This is what I like about the internet.

Who is less accountable to anyone than a tenured University Professor?

logo.png

There is no escaping the scrutiny of the Rate My Professors website. Check the page dedicated to my mentor Keith Russell at University of Saskatchewan.

kr.jpg

Or visit Keith on his far less exciting official web page on the U of S site.

best interview of 2006 – Eric Schmidt

(If this post looks too long, boring and geeky, instead listen to the 10min audiocast.) If it won’t play on your computer, you can hear the superb interview by clicking a link at it at the bottom of this page.

Not everyone agrees, but for me Eric Schmidt is the person best placed to predict the future of the internet.

He’s the CEO of Google. On the Apple Board of Directors. And capable of almost anything.

From his article in Economist:

Eric.jpgThe internet is much more than a technology—it’s a completely different way of organising our lives. But its success is built on technological superiority: protocols and open standards that are ingenious in their simplicity. Time after time they have trounced rival telecommunications standards that made perfect commercial sense to companies but no practical sense to consumers. …

But what’s surprising is that so many companies are still betting against the net, trying to solve today’s problems with yesterday’s solutions. The past few years have taught us that business models based on controlling consumers or content don’t work. Betting against the net is foolish because you’re betting against human ingenuity and creativity.

Of course this new technology raises profound challenges for many established companies. Skype, an internet telephony business (voice over IP), is as disruptive to the economics of the telecommunications industry as China has been to the global manufacturing sector. But that disruption is only going to intensify.

In 2007 we’ll witness the increasing dominance of open internet standards. As web access via mobile phones grows, these standards will sweep aside the proprietary protocols promoted by individual companies striving for technical monopoly. Today’s desktop software will be overtaken by internet-based services that enable users to choose the document formats, search tools and editing capability that best suit their needs.

The fastest-growing parts of the internet all involve direct human interaction. Think about the blogging phenomenon and social networking sites like MySpace in America, Bebo in Britain, Orkut in Brazil, CyWorld in Korea and Mixi in Japan. In 2007 the virtual communities so prevalent in Asia and among students will become mainstream. Political pundits may claim that society is becoming atomised, but online communities are thriving and growing. The internet is helping to satisfy our most fundamental human needs—our desire for knowledge, communication and a sense of belonging.

Trend is not destiny, of course. But as a no-nonsense sports writer once wrote during the depth of America’s Depression, “The race is not always to the swift nor the battle to the strong—but that’s the way to bet.” We’re betting on the internet because we believe that there’s a bull market in imagination online.

The World In 2007 | Dont bet against the internet

New Year’s predictions

In the future people without blogs will be as rare as people who don’t use email today.

128px-Feed-icon.svg.pngConsider RSS, for example. This is a fantastic resource brings virtually any kind of information you can think of to your desktop. Nevertheless, recent research shows that only 1 in 10 people have even heard of the term and a mere two percent actually use it.

OK, RSS is geeky you say? Fair enough. But consider that several studies conducted by the Pew Internet Center for American Life reveal that millions lurk but don’t publish. For example, only 35% of Americans post their photos online and only eight percent have ever published a blog.

Micro Persuasion: America’s New Digital Divide

Of course by then spammy email, as we know it now, will be gone. Replaced by some variation of instant messaging.

why business needs fear the internet

How can I run an on-line encyclopedia business when Wikipedia is free? And ad free?

Perhaps everything on the internet will be “no charge” one day. It’s possible.

Companies will not be able to demand money for information if someone is willing to give them the same thing for nothing.

A kooky “information wants to be free” pipe dream?

Imagine a guy that gets hundred of millions of page views and has no interest in monetizing. Imagine a guy that could sell his website for two billion dollars and is “just not interested”.

That guy doesn’t exist?

Meet Jim Buckmaster (yes, that’s his real name), CEO of Craigslist:

Information Architects Japan » iA Notebook » Democracy or profit? Ask Buckmaster

Here’s the top 10 websites on the internet by page view. Check #7.

Who wants to start a company to compete against craigslist?

CraigsList.jpg