Immigration in 2024

Everyone agrees the USA is a disaster when it comes to FIXING their immigration laws.

Trump shot down the most recent border bill effort.

ReTrumplicans want the disaster to continue at least as long as the 2024 election. They really don’t have many REAL issues to campaign on.

Freakonomics posted a 3 part audiocast series. Well worth listening to.

Listen to Freakonomics episode 580:

The True Story of America’s Supremely Messed-Up Immigration

Click PLAY or watch it on YouTube.

Click PLAY or listen to part 2 on YouTube. Episode 581.

I’ve always felt Canada is one of the best nations in handling immigration.

We welcome those who can fill necessary jobs.

The USA still uses a lottery. And mostly fills their quota with families.

Click PLAY or watch part 3 on YouTube. Episode 582 — Why Is Everyone Moving to Canada? 

Canada recently reduced their immigration target numbers. Not good for the economy. But there simply isn’t enough affordable accommodation for new citizens or foreign students.

Finally, the ReTrumplican GOP in 2024 is anti-immigrant. The opposite of Ronald Reagan.

Click PLAY or watch it on YouTube.

International Fact-Checking Day

International Fact-Checking Day was introduced at a conference for journalists and fact-checkers at the London School of Economics in June 2014.

… officially created in 2016 and first celebrated on April 2, 2017. …

It rose in importance after the 2016 elections, which brought fake news, as well as accusations of it, to the forefront of media issues. …

The invention of the Internet ➙ and Social Media made it much easier to circulate disinformation and misinformation.

What that means for YOU and ME is that we need check everything with sources we trust.

FactCheckingDay.com

WHY do the Brits Hate Trump?

Nate White, originally on Quora:

A few things spring to mind…

Trump lacks certain qualities which the British traditionally esteem.

For instance, he has no class, no charm, no coolness, no credibility, no compassion, no wit, no warmth, no wisdom, no subtlety, no sensitivity, no self-awareness, no humility, no honour and no grace – all qualities, funnily enough, with which his predecessor Mr. Obama was generously blessed.

So for us, the stark contrast does rather throw Trump’s limitations into embarrassingly sharp relief.

Plus, we like a laugh. And while Trump may be laughable, he has never once said anything wry, witty or even faintly amusing – not once, ever.

I don’t say that rhetorically, I mean it quite literally: not once, not ever. And that fact is particularly disturbing to the British sensibility – for us, to lack humour is almost inhuman.

But with Trump, it’s a fact. He doesn’t even seem to understand what a joke is – his idea of a joke is a crass comment, an illiterate insult, a casual act of cruelty.

Trump is a troll.

And like all trolls, he is never funny and he never laughs; he only crows or jeers.

And scarily, he doesn’t just talk in crude, witless insults – he actually thinks in them. His mind is a simple bot-like algorithm of petty prejudices and knee-jerk nastiness.

There is never any under-layer of irony, complexity, nuance or depth. It’s all surface.

Some Americans might see this as refreshingly upfront.

Well, we don’t. We see it as having no inner world, no soul.

And in Britain we traditionally side with David, not Goliath. All our heroes are plucky underdogs: Robin Hood, Dick Whittington, Oliver Twist.

Trump is neither plucky, nor an underdog. He is the exact opposite of that.

He’s not even a spoiled rich-boy, or a greedy fat-cat.

He’s more a fat white slug. A Jabba the Hutt of privilege.

And worse, he is that most unforgivable of all things to the British: a bully.

That is, except when he is among bullies; then he suddenly transforms into a snivelling sidekick instead.

There are unspoken rules to this stuff – the Queensberry rules of basic decency – and he breaks them all. He punches downwards – which a gentleman should, would, could never do – and every blow he aims is below the belt. He particularly likes to kick the vulnerable or voiceless – and he kicks them when they are down.

So the fact that a significant minority – perhaps a third – of Americans look at what he does, listen to what he says, and then think

‘Yeah, he seems like my kind of guy’

is a matter of some confusion and no little distress to British people, given that:

Americans are supposed to be nicer than us, and mostly are.

You don’t need a particularly keen eye for detail to spot a few flaws in the man.

This last point is what especially confuses and dismays British people, and many other people too; his faults seem pretty bloody hard to miss.

After all, it’s impossible to read a single tweet, or hear him speak a sentence or two, without staring deep into the abyss. He turns being artless into an art form;

He is a Picasso of pettiness; a Shakespeare of shit.

His faults are fractal: even his flaws have flaws, and so on ad infinitum.

God knows there have always been stupid people in the world, and plenty of nasty people too. But rarely has stupidity been so nasty, or nastiness so stupid.

He makes Nixon look trustworthy and George W look smart.

In fact, if Frankenstein decided to make a monster assembled entirely from human flaws – he would make a Trump.

And a remorseful Doctor Frankenstein would clutch out big clumpfuls of hair and scream in anguish:

‘My God… what… have… I… created?’

If being a twat was a TV show, Trump would be the boxed set.

The Diplomat – season 1

Rotten Tomatoes 83% — but I’d rate it higher.

For an American show, it’s surprisingly surprising. Non cliche. And the plot almost makes sense. 😀

Debora Cahn is an award-winning writer/producer known for The West Wing (1999) and Homeland (2020).

The Diplomat is an American political thriller television series …

The series centers on Kate Wyler, the new United States ambassador to the United Kingdom, as she helps to defuse an international crisis, forges strategic alliances and adjusts to her new place in the spotlight. She also manages her deteriorating marriage to fellow career diplomat Hal Wyler. …

Ato Essandoh as Stuart Hayford, deputy chief of mission of the US embassy in London, is very good. You really feel sorry for the poor guy.

Actually, the entire cast is excellent.

Click PLAY or watch it on YouTube.

I’d complain it drags some in the final episodes.

A cliff-hanger ending.

Hopefully season 2 will be a little faster paced.

Less emphasis on the romances.

American Spirits by Russell Banks

Russell Banks died in 2023 at age-82.

His novels are known for “detailed accounts of domestic strife and the daily struggles of ordinary often-marginalized characters” …

Banks was the 1985 recipient of the John Dos Passos Prize for fiction. 

Continental Drift and Cloudsplitter were finalists for the 1986 and 1999 Pulitzer Prize for Fiction respectively …

I only knew the name as the author of The Sweet Hereafter (1991).

American Spirits (2024) is his last publication.

Grim but compelling narratives from this fine writer.

Three stories unearth the bitterness and violence seething in a working-class American town.

These long narratives by the late Banks are all set in the northern New York village of Sam Dent that featured in The Sweet Hereafter (1991). But where that story dealt with a tragedy that affected the whole town, these explore the welter of pain that can afflict a single house. …

Kirkus Reviews – American Spirits

He based these stories on chatter he heard from strangers while sitting in a bar in Keene, New York. Some wearing MAGA hats. 😀

He was watching sports on TV while listening in to the conversations of drunk patrons.

Russell Banks writes to be a better person.

Click PLAY or watch it on YouTube.

Right Wing – Wants to Destroy Public Education

Recall one of Trump’s worst appointees — billionaire donor Betsy DeVos?

She wanted to disband public schools, giving those tax dollars to parents to spend on whatever they want ➙  school choiceschool voucher programs, or charter schools, for example.

Those are programs used mostly by the rich.

IF you want to send your children to Muslim school, Jewish school, Christian school, or SPORT school — great! So long as they meet minimum standards, your child should be credentialed.

That decided … should the taxpayer subsidize your special education?

My short answer is NO.

Like health care, IF you want special treatment, pay for it yourself.

Government should ensure that BASIC education and health care are made available to EVERYONE.

PUBLIC SCHOOLS and PUBLIC HEALTH CARE.

If you choose to have the Mayo Clinic treat you for cancer, pay for it yourself.

That’s my short answer.

My longer answer is that governments with plenty of money should be allowed to subsidize special education IF it doesn’t lower the quality of public school.

The best discussion I’ve heard on this was on my favourite PODCAST ➙ ON THE MEDIA.

The Real Mission Behind Moms for Liberty


As an example, here’s the GOP nominee for the top job running public schools in North Carolina. An $11 billion budget.

In the past she’s called for executing top Democrats. Endorsed QAnon and other conspiracy theories. Anti-Muslim. Anti-LBGTQ.

She marched for Trump on Jan. 6th.

Michele Morrow is about as rightwing kooky as they get.

No educational experience other than homeschooling her own kids.

Burn Book by Kara Swisher

Kara Swisher is today the #1 reporter covering the business of the internet.

Her mentor, Walt Mossberg.

The first of her 2-book memoir is a hit.

An entertaining read, even if you care nothing about the history of the internet.

Burn Book: A Tech Love Story by Kara Swisher

Almost everyone in Tech picks up the phone when Kara calls.

She’s a pugnacious interviewer who won’t back down to anyone.

I only follow Swisher because she launched Pivot, a semi-weekly news commentary podcast co-hosted by Swisher and Scott Galloway.

She’s a very hard worker. Extremely well connected. And a competent interviewer.

But Prof. Galloway is my guru in ALL things business. Swisher was smart — as well — to sign up Galloway.

In her new book, Swisher reflects back on some of the biggest stories she’s covered. And her opinions of some of the Tech giants.

John McLaughlin comes across worst. Also, Rupert Murdoch, her long time boss.

Mark Zuckerberg stories are embarrassing. Facebook evil.

She’s fascinated by Elon Musk — but entirely disappointed since he bought Twitter and made his legacy being something of a right wing troll.

I was surprised how much she admired Steve Jobs. A well known asshole, but one who slung less B.S. than the rest.

Tunnel in the Sky by Robert Heinlein

Like most teen boys my age, I read every Heinlein book I could get my hands on.

Tunnel in the Sky (1955) … a group of students sent on a survival test to an uninhabited planet, who soon realise they are stranded there. The themes of the work include the difficulties of growing up and the nature of man as a social animal.

His juvenile books are rollicking adventures. No profanity.

But on another level, Heinlein was a provocative philosopher on matters of personal freedom, particularly sexual freedom, libertarianism, religion, politics, and government.

Heinlein wrote strong female characters decades before it was cool. 😀

My main takeaway from Tunnel is the truism that rule of law must come first.

Everything else, later.

If you don’t have enforceable laws, wannabe dictators will insist criminals are tourists.

Here’s Georgia GOP Andrew Clyde barricading the doors of the Senate. He later called those attacking him tourists.

Trump called them “political prisoners.” And “hostages.”

Any objective person would want those breaking into their home or business arrested.  To deny this fact is to deny rule of law.

As in Lord of the Flies, which had been published a year earlier, isolation reveals the true natures of the students as individuals. The Heinlein book is more optimistic, however.

The colony of young people in Tunnel do establish rule of law.  Democracy. 

In any case, it’s still worth reading Heinlein books today. They are thought provoking.

On American Imperialism

My love / hate relationship with the USA started early.

In University 1983, one of my textbooks in a sociology course was:

Under The Eagle: United States Intervention in Central America and the Caribbean

The history of the USA is damning.

No wonder Putin and others keep pointing out past wars started by the USA.

I spent a lot of time on a term paper: The Rise of American Imperialism and Precipitating Factors

Super critical of most American interventions in their part of the world.

I particularly criticized puppet dictators supported by Washington: Samoza, Trujillo, Batista, etc.

I only got a C+ / B- on the paper. 😀