I Switched from Twitter to Bluesky

A MAGA NAZI owns Twitter now. He deliberately posts misinformation and disinformation.

Twitter is now too immoral and dangerous for me.

So far, I like Bluesky much better. For one thing, it embeds correctly in this website.

RickMcCharles.com is my Bluesky handle.

VIDEO ➙ Strong is Beautiful. Gymnastics icon Brooklyn Moors. gymnasticscoaching.com/2025/03/28/b…

— Rick McCharles (@rickmccharles.com) 2025-03-28T15:07:05.973Z

Here’s my attempt to embed a public Facebook post on this site.

And here’s Instagram.

BEST Social Networks 2025

For most people, Instagram and TikTok are the most entertaining. I don’t much look at either.

If you want to avoid POLITICS, Meta (Instagram, Facebook, Threads) has definitely reduced the emphasis on political arguments. In Canada, a bonus for using Facebook is that news links are banned.

I haven’t quit Twitter — surprisingly — as my own feeds focused on Gymnastics and Hiking are still good. If I click on Following and avoid For You, the stream is valuable. Of course I quickly block anything I don’t like.

I post today as many of the people online I trust and respect are migrating to Bluesky.

Looking more for VIDEO than anything else, these are the sites I use most:

I hate advertising. Facebook doesn’t offer paid ad-free feeds, so I use ad blockers.

I hate Elon Musk and refuse to send him even one penny. So use ad blockers.

I use WhatsApp only for small group communication. It’s excellent. Messenger, as well, only for communication with very few people.

I’ll check Reddit once in a while if I’m looking for something specific.

Mastodon could be my favourite, but it’s not caught on with the people I want to follow.

LinkedIn should be best of all. But I’ve never seen much value for my purposes.

I never signed up for Snapchat. Hikers are mostly on Instagram. Gymnastics coaches mostly on Twitter.

I’ll try Bluesky. But I’m worried it will never grow big enough.

If desperate, I’ll create a browser bookmark folder and open all these social media sites simultaneously to check the latest news in Gymnastics and Hiking. OR … could I use an A.I. client to do that for me?

Brainstorming … 😀

International Fact-Checking Day

International Fact-Checking Day was introduced at a conference for journalists and fact-checkers at the London School of Economics in June 2014.

… officially created in 2016 and first celebrated on April 2, 2017. …

It rose in importance after the 2016 elections, which brought fake news, as well as accusations of it, to the forefront of media issues. …

The invention of the Internet ➙ and Social Media made it much easier to circulate disinformation and misinformation.

What that means for YOU and ME is that we need check everything with sources we trust.

FactCheckingDay.com

I don’t like Instagram

I’d avoided this Facebook social media alternative — until the pandemic. It’s very popular with outdoor recreation folks so I started posting near daily on @BestHikeVisuals.

This parody nails it. 😀

Click PLAY or watch it on Vimeo.

Day 1 for me on Instagram was November 9, 2020.

It’s shocking how limited Instagram is compared with Facebook. For example:

  • until recently, it was super difficult to post from a computer
  • Instagram images sometimes don’t show on browsers with ad blockers installed
  • you have no control over the sizes of thumbnails. They often look stupid.
  • Instagram videos are often poor quality and look bad when viewed from a computer rather than a phone

I’m up to over 600 posts now. And it IS rewarding to quickly scan all of those. And there are some very good photos.

But many of the coolest influencers are posting less to Instagram. Looking to TikTok and other social media.

Burn Book by Kara Swisher

Kara Swisher is today the #1 reporter covering the business of the internet.

Her mentor, Walt Mossberg.

The first of her 2-book memoir is a hit.

An entertaining read, even if you care nothing about the history of the internet.

Burn Book: A Tech Love Story by Kara Swisher

Almost everyone in Tech picks up the phone when Kara calls.

She’s a pugnacious interviewer who won’t back down to anyone.

I only follow Swisher because she launched Pivot, a semi-weekly news commentary podcast co-hosted by Swisher and Scott Galloway.

She’s a very hard worker. Extremely well connected. And a competent interviewer.

But Prof. Galloway is my guru in ALL things business. Swisher was smart — as well — to sign up Galloway.

In her new book, Swisher reflects back on some of the biggest stories she’s covered. And her opinions of some of the Tech giants.

John McLaughlin comes across worst. Also, Rupert Murdoch, her long time boss.

Mark Zuckerberg stories are embarrassing. Facebook evil.

She’s fascinated by Elon Musk — but entirely disappointed since he bought Twitter and made his legacy being something of a right wing troll.

I was surprised how much she admired Steve Jobs. A well known asshole, but one who slung less B.S. than the rest.

‘Enshittification’ of the Internet

Cory Doctorow is without question one of the smartest and most eloquent of Tech pundits.

… an activist in favour of liberalising copyright laws and a proponent of the Creative Commons organization, using some of their licences for his books. Some common themes of his work include digital rights management, file sharing, and post-scarcity economics. …

HERE IS HOW platforms die: First, they are good to their users; then they abuse their users to make things better for their business customers; finally, they abuse those business customers to claw back all the value for themselves. Then, they die. …

I call this enshittification, …

Amazon, Facebook, Tiktok. All of them.

The Google search engine app on my phone is totally ‘enshittified’ — nobody could appreciate so many inappropriate advertisements.

Wikipedia is not enshittified.

Why?

It’s not based on advertising. Ads are the main reason the internet is getting enshittified.

I don’t suffer much because I have every ad blocker known to man working in the Chrome browser. I rarely see ads, except on my phone.

Facebook ads are hardest to avoid.

I pay for YouTube Premium to avoid ads in the middle of my videos.

Click through to read the article for yourself:

The ‘Enshittification’ of TikTok

I was WRONG about anonymity online

It seems self evident that people would be more civil online IF they couldn’t be anonymous.

But research shows that’s not the case.

Perhaps the world expert in governance of online speech, Kate Klonick, concluded that having both public and anonymous options is BEST for reducing hate and increasing the value of social media.

Many, many individuals are unable to speak honestly unless they can be anonymous.

Listen to her interviewed on Pivot.

Listen to Elon

I’m often critical of Elon Musk. Turned off by his egomania.

Disappointed in his juvenile comments from the bully pulpit of Twitter. One of the richest and most powerful men in the world attacking and mocking people who are unable to fight back.

I’m disappointed that a guy who claims he doesn’t care about money is so reluctant to pay more in taxes though his businesses have received billions of dollars in tax subsidies.

That said, I admire almost everything else. His work ethic. His companies, especially Boring and Starlink.

Elon Musk does much more good for the world than bad. He’s scientific and well aware of the risks of climate change. He calls for a carbon tax. Musk endorsed Andrew Yang and expressed support for his proposed universal basic income.

Though the headlines shout that Elon is a “free speech absolutist”, Musk himself says Twitter must abide by the laws of each nation. I doubt much will change in terms of Twitter policy in Canada or the USA.

In fact, I’m guessing Twitter will be better for me with Musk as owner.

Warren had me watch this recent interview. Elon defends his life and ethics quite well.

Click PLAY or watch it on YouTube.

CANCEL me in 2022

If you are irked that I call Donald Trump the fat golfer, please stop following my posts.

After a lifetime study of comparative religion, Joseph Campbell concluded that the best course was to Follow your Bliss. Make a list of those things in your life that you most enjoy; those things that enervate you, compel you; interest you in a sustained way. Do them!

Make a second list of those things that vex your existence. How can you avoid or minimize those? CANCEL them.

When in office I mostly called Trump the toddler President — rash, undisciplined, selfish, spoiled. Out of office fat golfer better sums up my opinion of him in a short, colourful way. Trump is the master of name calling. Since he does it, I feel it’s ethical to reciprocate.

The Ugly American

I believe in freedom of speech. The fat golfer can say whatever he wants on his golf course. BUT not in my home. Not on my blogs. Nor my social media feeds.

I also believe in the freedom to NOT listen to speech.

Since Rush Limbaugh — the Big Fat Idiot — popularized the notion of cancelling people in the 1980s, the word cancelled has become increasingly loaded. And increasingly meaningless.

Though I’m left leaning, I haven’t yet cancelled JK Rowling, Woody Allen, Jordan Peterson and many more. You should if they irritate you enough.

I AM quick to unsubscribe to organizations and people I believe are distributing dangerous and/or unethical content online.

Certainly the American GOP / FOX money making machine picks a new Mr. Potato Head to cancel every day. Gots to keep their mostly old, white supporters angry. (That story was fake news, by the way.)

The best coverage of this issue I’ve heard is on my favourite podcast – Reputation.

How to Live Forever (or Die Trying) – On the Media

From ‘Blue Zones’ branded food to anti-aging peptides, the marketplace is flooded with products promising to help us live longer and better. On this week’s On the Media, a researcher calls into question the data behind some of the most popular ‘longevity science.’ Plus, why Silicon Valley billionaires are obsessed with the end of the world. [01:00] A new book titled Morbid: Debunking Modern Longevity Science, out this week, alleges that much of the research underpinning longevity science is hot air. Host Micah Loewinger explores the contours of this heated debate within the field, and speaks with the book’s author, Saul Newman, a research fellow at the Oxford Institute of Population Ageing, about the prevalence of fraudulent 100+ year olds, and his gripes with the popular “Blue Zones” research and the multimillion-dollar business that grew out of it. We also hear from New York Magazine writer Kerry Howley and one of the originators of Blue Zones, demographer Michel Poulain. Plus, the growing grift within the field, and the Silicon Valley tech giants spending millions to try to vanquish death.[31:39] Micah speaks to Naomi Klein and Astra Taylor, co-authors of End Times Fascism And the Fight for the Living World, about a new strain of apocalyptic fascism emerging in Silicon Valley and the White House that rejects the idea of a future on Earth, and how to fight back. Further reading / watching:“Demographers at War: Fake centenarians, faulty data, junk science, and contested “blue zones,” by Kerry Howley“Supercentenarians and the oldest-old are concentrated into regions with no birth certificates and short lifespans,” by Saul Newman“The validity of Blue Zones demography: a response to critiques,” by Steven Austad and Giovanni PesLive to 100: Secrets of the Blue Zones, NetflixStatement from Dan Buettner, founder of Blue Zones LLC:The Blue Zones findings are based on more than two decades of demographic and scientific research, with methods and conclusions documented in peer-reviewed literature and examined by independent researchers.Age validation and record-keeping have already been carefully investigated, and Newman’s theories were explicitly debunked in a recent peer-reviewed article published in The Gerontologist. Presenting conspiracy theories or allegations that have already been disproven as equivalent to a large, well-established body of evidence is misleading to the public.Email exchange with Dan Buettner:FROM OTM: Michel Poulain told us that there is “no proof” that Loma Linda, California is a blue zone because “we don’t have the same possibility of validation of age.” He said that “When I discussed with Dan Buettner, he admitted that he had to introduce this Loma Linda because National Geographic wanted to have a US taste in the system.” In response to those statements, we intend to paraphrase the statement you sent us via email about how Loma Linda likely no longer qualifies as a blue zone under a new formal definition you’re working on. DAN BUETTNER: Before I wrote about Blue Zones in National Geographic in 2005, it was not known to anyone by a roomful of demographers and the 50 or so readers of Experimental Gerontology.  It was my idea to make it an international term and absent a clear criteria, I named Loma Linda a Blue Zone. We have not evaluated Loma Linda with the new criteria yet.FROM OTM: New York Magazine writer Kerry Howley told us that “Poulain says that Buettner went ahead and [trademarked] the term Blue Zones, the term Poulain had originated without his permission, without his even knowing.” Do you agree with this characterization?DAN BUETTNER: If you do some research, you’ll find that Gianni Pes coined the phrase Blue Zones. He has blessed my use of blue zones over the past 25 years…. I encourage you to reach out to him before you make the error of implying or saying that Michel originated the phrase or the international concept which is the foundation of my books.Gianni and I published an article identifying a new Blue Zone last week. Michel is an excellent demographer and I have appreciated his collaboration as part of our National Geographic explorer grants, in helping me validate blue zones in Costa Rica, Ikaira and Sardinia.FROM OTM: Michel Poulain claimed that after you asked him to testify in a case against Chanel for using the term “Blue Zone” to market a skincare product, he did not collaborate as much with you anymore. Is that how you remember it?DAN BUETTNER: There has been no widely agreed upon criteria for a Blue Zone until AFAR pulled together their consortium earlier this year. I named Singapore a new blue zone for the 2024 Netflix “Live to 100” documentary because, at the time, the global burden of disease project ranked Singapore #1 in health adjusted life expectancy. Statement from demographer Michel Poulain, one of the originators of blue zones research: To summarize the [origin of the] BZ [Blue Zones] story shortly:1. The team of Sassari and Gianni Pes presented their AKEA results on exceptional longevity in Sardinia in October 1999 in Montpellier.2. As the demographers attending the meeting were highly suspicious on the validity of the age of centenarians in Sardinia, they charged me to go in Sardinia to validate individually the age of the centenarians expecting that I will be back with the explanation on errors in age reporting.3. I landed in Alghero on January 22, 2000 and started the age validation of many centenarians with the support of Gianni Pes and Ciriaco Carru.4. I was quickly convinced of the validity of the age of all centenarians and doing so the individual longevity was proved and my mission could be completed.5. This is the moment when, in spring 2000, I switched from individual longevity to population longevity and, as demographer, I reported the number of centenarians born in a village by the total number of newborns in the same cohort. This proportion of centenarians became the Extreme Longevity index (ELI).§. Thereafter WE (Gianni and me) marked on the map of Sardinia all municipalities with high value of ELI, using a Blue Marker. Who chose the blue is unknown except that it is my preferred color and my eyes are blue… If it was in red, the red zones will never exist. Concretely already in April 2000 I sent a message to Gianni and Ciriaco where I mentioned the term 'BLUE ZONE.’6. It took us 4 years to publish our results as all our colleagues remained skeptical and finally were so happy to put their name in the paper published in Experimental Gerontology of whom I am the first author.7. So I consider that Gianni, Ciriaco and the team of AKEA were the researchers that discovered the exceptional longevity in Sardinia. Personally I validated the age of centenarians with the support of Gianni and Ciriaco and thereafter I initiated the demographic concept of Blue Zone when with Gianni we used a blue marker to identify the villages with higher ELI.8. Dan Buettner mentioned in his paper of 2005 that the team of demographers named Blue Zone the area with higher longevity in Sardinia.9. Thereafter he asked me to find another Blue Zone and we visited Nicoya in August 2007 and validated the second BZ in early 2008 before to do the same in Ikaria in spring 2009. I was responsible for these choices.10. He is responsible for the large popularisation of the Blue Zones.11. As such we are equally responsible for the importance of the Blue Zone story whereas Saul Newman appeared in the story only in 2018, amazingly after he followed my talk on Blue Zones in Canberra University. Statement from demographer Giovanni Pes, one of the originators of blue zones research: Regarding the origins of the term [Blue Zones], the story goes back to October 9, 1999, when I presented, for the first time, evidence of an exceptional concentration of centenarians in central Sardinia at a demographic conference in Montpellier, France. My findings were initially met with skepticism, including from Michel Poulain. However, at the end of the conference, Michel expressed his willingness to visit Sardinia and verify the data with me.In January 2000, we began traveling through Sardinia's 377 municipalities, collecting information on centenarians from local civil registry offices. I had prepared a map of the island by hand, and whenever we identified a municipality with more centenarians than expected, I marked it with a blue felt-tip pen.Soon, the blue dots revealed a clear geographical concentration in central-eastern Sardinia, particularly in the region of Ogliastra. As we traveled from one municipality to another, we spontaneously began referring to this area as the “Blue Zone.” We later adopted the expression in our first scientific publications.Although the map and the blue pen were mine, I consider the term “Blue Zone” to have emerged naturally from our conversations rather than having been invented exclusively by either of us. The earliest written evidence of the expression that I am aware of is an email exchange between Michel and me dating from March 2000.I therefore believe it would be historically accurate to say that myself and Michel Poulain jointly coined the term “Blue Zone” in 2000, building on the demographic research I had initiated earlier in Sardinia.Regarding Dan Buettner's use of the term, I have never objected to his use of “Blue Zones” for commercial purposes. My interests have always been purely scientific and academic. Unlike Dan and Michel, who have developed commercial activities associated with the concept—the latter through the Living Blue Zone trademark—I have no commercial interests in the name.My relationship with Dan remains excellent. In fact, we recently co-authored a scientific paper on exceptional longevity in Bolotana, Sardinia. I see no reason why he should not make use of the findings of my scientific research, provided that their scientific meaning is accurately represented.  On the Media is supported by listeners like you. Support OTM by donating today (https://pledge.wnyc.org/support/otm). Follow our show on Instagram, Bluesky, TikTok and Facebook @onthemedia, and share your thoughts with us by emailing onthemedia@wnyc.org. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
  1. How to Live Forever (or Die Trying)
  2. Micah's Conversation With Lilliana Mason LONG VERSION
  3. Polarization Is Not Our Biggest Problem
  4. Locked Up In Russia
  5. Trump's Guide to Stealing an Election